SAVE JONES BEACH AD HOC COMMITTEE
                             PO BOX 631
                   BABYLON, NEW YORK 11702


NEWS RELEASE

For Immediate Release: January 6, 2006


Contacts: Phil Healy           516-790-4431
               Walter Arnold      516-221-1770


SJBAHC On LIPA’s Offshore Wind Plant

Babylon, NY-  Since its inception the SJBAHC has consistently called for formal public hearings and full environmental reviews under the laws of the land regarding LIPA’s offshore wind plant proposal. The SJBAHC has not been alone in this clarion call for these reviews.

In documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act the SJBAHC has learned that many civic associations, environmental and fishing organizations, as well as towns and state and federal regulatory agencies share similar concerns as the SJBAHC.

“ The SJBAHC has long known that it was not alone in our call for clarity and transparency in this process,’ stated Phil Healy, Co-Chair of the SJBAHC, ‘ There is a great deal at stake here and we want to be assured that the best available science is applied and that our laws are being adhered too.”


A sampling of the above mentioned concerns and views are attached and are provided to you by the SJBAHC.

Department of Commerce National Marine Fisheries
Service
August 12, 2005

“ The lack of information of environmental impacts is substantial to the extent that NMFS is unable to complete its consultation, but we do provide and request these detailed information needs. ”

Department of Interior US Fish & Wildlife Service
August 11, 2005

“ Specifically, we recommend that the Corps initiate, under NEPA, the environmental scoping process to determine which studies are appropriate and necessary to gather additional information for the preparation of an EIS. The project scoping process should involve both the public and interested government agencies.”

US Environmental Protection Agency
July 22, 2005

“ EPA is concerned that the project’s potential to cause significant impacts to the environment has not been fully explored.”

US Coast Guard
August 10, 2005

“ Although located outside of the Nantucket to Ambrose traffic lanes, the risk to navigation safety may be increased during foul weather or catastrophic mechanical failure on board a commercial vessel operating within the proximity to the proposed project. The large commercial vessels utilizing the shipping lanes frequently
include tankers carrying petroleum products in quantities, which, if discharged due to a collision, could cause significant environmental impact.”

Department of Interior National Park Service
August 11, 2005

“The NPS would like to see a full cumulative impact analysis regarding cultural and natural resources. The Fire Island Lighthouse is under the jurisdiction of the National Park service and we want to ensure that the NEPA document fully considers the impacts to the historic view shed.”

NY State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic
Preservation
July 18, 2005

“In light of the view shed, SHPO is requesting more simulations in order to fully assess and understand the potential visual impacts. SHPO is requesting that additional simulations from the beach perspective (not the boardwalk) at both Jones beach and Robert Moses State Park depicting the view in differing sun and atmospheric conditions be generated.”

NY State Department of Environmental Conservation
August 11, 2005

“The Department urges the COE to require the preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the project and the comments provided below are in support of that recommendation.”

State of New York Public Service
August 5, 2005

“These comments identify certain environmental concerns that need to be evaluated and recommend components of further studies that are necessary to fully characterize and assess the extent of environmental impacts related to the Project. “

State of New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection
July 8, 2005

“ In conclusion, the activities that are subject of the application to the ACOE are reasonably likely to affect land and water uses and natural resources of New Jersey’s coastal zone and thus the activities are subject to the consistency review requirements of Section 307(c) (3) (A) of the CZMA.”

Town of Babylon
August 3, 2005

“Based upon the aforementioned issues the Town of Babylon requests that the Corps of Engineers as intended Lead Agency, require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to NEPA Title 40.”

Town of Oyster Bay
August 11, 2005

“In light of the forgoing, it is respectfully suggested that the facts in this case warrant the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement.”

 

 

 

Save Jones Beach Ad Hoc Committee
PO Box 631
Babylon, NY 11702

PRESS RELEASE

For Immediate Release: January 11, 2006

SJBAHC Contacts: Walter Arnold 516-221-1770 and
Phil Healey 516-790-4431

LIOWP MISSED CONNECTION
LIPA’s offshore wind cable long on rhetoric and short on disclosure

Babylon, NY:  Through documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act it is clear that LIPA continues to ignore the recommendation of the US Fish & Wildlife Service to locate the proposed Long Island Offshore Wind Plant power cable in an already existing utility-right-of-way along the Wantagh Causeway.

LIPA’s current proposal has the LIOWP 138 kilovolt 4.6-mile cable running offshore to onshore through Jones Beach Island and across the Great South Bay and making land at Clocks Boulevard after leaving the Narraskatuck River.

In a letter dated July 28, 2004 US F&WS recommended LIPA co-locate its cable along the Wantagh Causeway with its Neptune cable, which is currently being installed. The US F&WS repeated its recommendation on August 12, 2005  ‘to reduce environmental impacts associated with construction and maintenance’.

To date LIPA has dismissed the Wantagh Causeway route citing costs but has offered no substantive documentation to back up that claim.

 

 

 

 
Home